Entered according to Act of Parliament of Canada by J. G. Bourinot, in the Office
of the Minister of Agriculture, in the year 1893.
GAZETTE PRINTING COMPANY, MONTREAL.
To my Friends
Sir J. W. DAWSON, (c.m.g., f.r.s.c., ll.d.)
AND
MONSIGNOR HAMEL, (m.a., f.r.s.c.),
WHO REPRESENT THE CULTURE AND LEARNING OF THE ENGLISH AND FRENCH
ELEMENTS OF THE CANADIAN PEOPLE,
I dedicate
THIS SHORT REVIEW OF THE INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT
OF THE NEW DOMINION.
PREFATORY NOTE.
This monograph on the intellectual development of the Dominion was delivered in substance as the presidential address to the Royal Society of Canada at its May meeting of 1893, in Ottawa. Since then the author has given the whole subject a careful revision, and added a number of bibliographical and other literary notes which could not conveniently appear in the text of the address, but are likely to interest those who wish to follow more closely the progress of culture in a country still struggling with the difficulties of the material development of half a continent. This little volume, as the title page shows, is intended as the commencement of a series of historical and other essays which will be periodically reproduced, in this more convenient form for the general reader, from the large quarto volumes of the Royal Society of Canada, where they first appear.
Ottawa, 1st October, 1893.
ANALYSIS OF CONTENTS.
I.—P. 1.
Introductory remarks on the overestimate of material success in America; citation from an oration on the subject by James Russell Lowell; application of his remarks to Canadians.
II.—P. 4.
Three well defined eras of development in Canada; the French regime and its heroic aspect; the works of Champlain, Lescarbot, Potherie, Le Clercq, Charlevoix and others; evidences of some culture in Quebec and Montreal; the foundation of the Jesuit College and the Seminaries; Peter Kalm on the study of science; the mental apathy of the colony generally in the days of French supremacy.
III.—P. 9.
The period of political development from 1760–1840, under English government; low state of popular education; growth of the press; influence of the clergy; intellectual contests in legislative halls; publication of "Sam Slick"; development of a historical literature.
IV.—P. 14.
An era of intellectual as well as material activity commences in 1840, after the concession of responsible government; political life still claims best intellects; names of prominent politicians and statesmen from 1840–1867; performance in literature and science; gross partisanship of the press; poems of Crémazie, Howe, Sangster and others; histories of Christie, Bibaud, Garneau and Ferland.
V.—P. 19.
Historical writers from 1867–1893—Dent, Turcotte, Casgrain, Sulte, Kingsford, etc.; Canadian poets—LeMay, Reade, Mair, Roberts, Carman and others; critical remarks on the character of French and English Canadian poetry; comparison between Canadian and Australian writers; patriotic spirit of Canadian poems.
VI.—P. 27.
Essay writing in Canada; weakness of attempts at fiction; Richardson's "Wacousta"; De Gaspé's "Anciens Canadiens"; Kirby's "Golden Dog"; Marmette's "F. de Bienville," among best works of this class; Professor De Mille and his works; successful efforts of Canadians abroad—Gilbert Parker, Sara Jeannette Duncan and L. Dougall; general remarks on literary progress during half a century; the literature of science in Canada eminently successful.
VII.—P. 33.
A short review of the origin and history of the Royal Society of Canada; its aim, the encouragement of the literature of learning and science, and of original ethnographical, archæological, historic and scientific investigation; desirous of stimulating broad literary criticism; associated with all other Canadian societies engaged in the same work; the wide circulation of its Transactions throughout the world; the need of a magazine of a high class in Canada.
VIII.—P. 42.
The intellectual standard of our legislative bodies; the literature of biography, law and theology; summary of general results of intellectual development; difficulties in the way of successful literary pursuits in Canada; good work sure of appreciative criticism by the best class of English periodicals like the "Contemporary," "Athenæum," "English Historical Magazine," "Academy," etc.; Sainte-Beuve's advice to cultivate a good style cited; some colonial conditions antagonistic to literary growth; the necessity of cultivating a higher ideal of literature in these modern times.
IX.—P. 49.
The condition of education in Canada; speed and superficiality among the defects of an otherwise admirable system; tendency to make all studies subordinate to a purely utilitarian spirit; the need of cultivating the "humanities," especially Greek; remarks on this point by Matthew Arnold and Goldwin Smith; the state of the press of Canada; the Canadian Pythia and Olympia.
X.—P. 53.
Libraries in Canada; development of art; absence of art galleries in the cities, and of large private collections of paintings; meritorious work of O'Brien, Reed, Peel, Pinhey, Forster and others; establishment of the Canadian Academy by the Princess Louise and the Marquess of Lorne; necessity for greater encouragement of native artists; success of Canadian artists at the World's Fair; architecture in Canada imitative and not creative; the White City at Chicago an illustration of the triumph of intellectual and artistic effort over the spirit of mere materialism; its effect probably the development of a higher culture and creative artistic genius on the continent.
XI.—P. 58.
Conclusion: The French language and its probable duration in Canada; the advantages of a friendly rivalry among French and English Canadians, which will best stimulate the genius of their peoples in art and letters; necessity for sympathetic encouragement of the two languages and of the mental efforts of each other; less provincialism or narrowness of mental vision likely to gain larger audiences in other countries; conditions of higher intellectual development largely dependent on a widening of our mental horizon, the creation of wider sympathy for native talent, the disappearance of a tendency to self-depreciation, and greater self-reliance and confidence in our own intellectual resources.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL, ART AND GENERAL NOTES.
(1) P. 61.—Lowell's remarks on the study of the Liberal Arts.
(2) P. 61.—Jamestown, Va.
(3) P. 61.—Champlain's Works; his character compared with that of Captain John Smith.
(4) P. 62.—Lescarbot's "Histoire de la Nouvelle France."
(5) P. 62.—Charlevoix's "Histoire et Description Générale de la Nouvelle France."
(6) P. 63.—Hutchinson's "History of Massachusetts."
(7) P. 63.—Sagard's "Le Grand Voyage," etc.
(8) P. 63.—P. Boucher's "Mœurs et Productions de la Nouvelle France."
(9) P. 63.—Jesuit Relations.
(10) P. 63.—Père du Creux, "Historia Canadensis."
(11) P. 63.—La Potherie's "Histoire de l'Amérique Septentrionale."
(11a) P. 63.—The Jesuit Lafitau and his work on Indian customs.
(12) P. 64.—C. le Clercq, "Etablissement de la Foy."
(13) P. 64.—Cotton Mather's "Magnalia."
(13a) P. 64.—Dr. Michel Sarrazin.
(13b) P. 64,—Peter Kalm and the English colonies.
(14) P. 65.—Education in Canada, 1792–1893.
(15) P. 65.—Upper Canada, 1792–1840.
(16) P. 66.—Canadian Journalism.
(17) P. 66.—Howe's Speeches.
(18) P. 66.—"Sam Slick."
(19) P. 66.—Judge Haliburton's History of Nova Scotia.
(20) P. 66.—W. Smith's History of Canada.
(21) P. 67.—Joseph Bouchette's Topographical Works on Canada.
(22) P. 67.—M. Bibaud's Histories of Canada.
(23) P. 67.—Thompson's Book on the War of 1812–14.
(24) P. 67.—Belknap's History of New Hampshire.
(25) P. 67.—The poet Crémazie.
(26) P. 68.—Chauveau as a poet.
(27) P. 69.—Howe's Poems.
(28) P. 69.—The poets Sangster and McLachlan.
(29) P. 69.—Charles Heavysege's Works.
(30) P. 69.—Todd's Parliamentary Government.
(31) P. 69.—Christie's History of Lower Canada.
(32) P. 70.—Garneau's History of Canada.
(33) P. 70.—Ferland and Faillon as Canadian Historians.
(34) P. 70.—Dent's Histories of Canada.
(35) P. 71.—Turcotte's History since Union of 1841.
(36) P. 71.—B. Sulte, "Histoire des Canadiens Français," etc.
(37) P. 71.—Abbé Casgrain's Works.
(38) P. 71.—Kingsford, Dionne, Gosselin, Tassé, Tanguay, and other Canadian historians.
(39) P. 72.—A Canadian Bibliography.
(40) P. 72.—Later Canadian Poets, 1867–1893: Fréchette, LeMay, W. Campbell Roberts, Lampman, Mair, O'Brien, McColl, Suite, Lockhart, Murray, Edgar, O'Hagan, Davin, etc. Collections of Canadian poems. Citations from Canadian poems.
(41) P. 77.—"In My Heart." By John Reade.
(41a) P. 78.—"Laura Secord's Warning," from Mrs. Edgar's "Ridout Letters."
(42) P. 79.—Australian poets and novelists.
(43) P. 80.—Howe's "Flag of Old England."
(44) P. 81.—Canadian essayists: Stewart, Grant, Griffin and others.
(45) P. 81.—W. Kirby's "Golden Dog" and other works.
(45a) P. 82.—Major Richardson's "Wacousta," etc.
(46) P. 82.—Marmette's "François de Bienville," and other romances.
(47) P. 82.—De Gaspé's "Anciens Canadiens."
(48) P. 82.—Mrs. Catherwood's works of fiction.
(49) P. 83.—Gilbert Parker's writings.
(50) P. 83.—DeMille's fiction.
(51) P. 83.—Sara Jeannette Duncan's "A Social Departure," etc.
(52) P. 83.—Matthew Arnold on Literature and Science.
(53) P. 83.—Principal Grant's Address to Royal Society.
(54) P. 84.—Sir J. W. Dawson's scientific labours.
(55) P. 84.—Elkanah Billings as scientist.
(56) P. 84.—Origin of Royal Society of Canada.
(57) P. 84.—Sir D. Wilson, T. S. Hunt and Mr. Chauveau.
(58) P. 84.—Canadian Literary and Scientific Societies.
(58a) P. 85.—The Earl of Derby's farewell address to the Royal Society. His opinion of its work and usefulness.
(59) P. 86.—S. E. Dawson on Tennyson.
(60) P. 86.—The old "Canadian Monthly."
(61) P. 86.—Form of Royal Society Transactions.
(62) P. 86.—Goldwin Smith on the study of the Classics.
(63) P. 87.—Canadian Libraries.
(64) P. 87.—List of artists in Canada. Native born and adopted. Art societies. Influence of French school. Canadian artists at the World's Fair. J. W. L. Forster on Canadian art.
(64a) P. 89.—Architectural art in Canada. List of prominent public buildings noted for beauty and symmetry of form.
(65) P. 91.—"Fidelis."
OUR INTELLECTUAL
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS.
A SHORT REVIEW OF
Literature, Education and Art in Canada
I cannot more appropriately commence this address than by a reference to an oration delivered seven years ago in the great hall of a famous university which stands beneath the stately elms of Cambridge, in the old "Bay State" of Massachusetts: a noble seat of learning in which Canadians take a deep interest, not only because some of their sons have completed their education within its walls, but because it represents that culture and scholarship which know no national lines of separation, but belong to the world's great Federation of Learning. The orator was a man who, by his deep philosophy, his poetic genius, his broad patriotism, his love for England, her great literature and history, had won for himself a reputation not equalled in some respects by any other citizen of the United States of these later times. In the course of a brilliant oration in honour[1][A] of the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the foundation of Harvard, James Russell Lowell took occasion to warn his audience against the tendency of a prosperous democracy "towards an overweening confidence in itself and its home-made methods, an overestimate of material success and a corresponding indifference to the things of the mind." He did not deny that wealth is a great fertilizer of civilization and of the arts that beautify it; that wealth is an excellent thing since it means power, leisure and liberty; "but these," he went on to say, "divorced from culture, that is, from intelligent purpose, become the very mockery of their own essence, not goods, but evils fatal to their possessor, and bring with them, like the Nibelungen Hoard, a doom instead of a blessing." "I am saddened," he continued, "when I see our success as a nation measured by the number of acres under tillage, or of bushels of wheat exported; for the real value of a country must be weighed in scales more delicate than the balance of trade. The garners of Sicily are empty now, but the bees from all climes still fetch honey from the tiny garden-plot of Theocritus. On a map of the world you may cover Judea with your thumb, Athens with a finger-tip, and neither of them figures in the Prices Current; but they still lord it in the thought and action of every civilized man. Did not Dante cover with his hood all that was Italy six hundred years ago? And if we go back a century, where was Germany outside of Weimar? Material success is good, but only as the necessary preliminary of better things. The measure of a nation's true success is the amount it has contributed to the thought, the moral energy, the intellectual happiness, the spiritual hope and consolation of mankind."
These eloquently suggestive words, it must be remembered, were addressed by a great American author to an audience, made up of eminent scholars and writers, in the principal academic seat of that New England which has given birth to Emerson, Longfellow, Bancroft, Prescott, Motley, Hawthorne, Holmes, Parkman, and many others, representing the brightest thought and intellect of this continent. These writers were the product of the intellectual development of the many years that had passed since the pilgrims landed on the historic rock of Plymouth. Yet, while Lowell could point to such a brilliant array of historians, essayists, poets and novelists, as I have just named, as the latest results of New England culture, he felt compelled to utter a word of remonstrance against that spirit of materialism that was then as now abroad in the land, tending to stifle those generous intellectual aspirations which are best calculated to make a people truly happy and great.
Let us now apply these remarks of the eminent American poet and thinker to Canada—to ourselves, whose history is even older than that of New England; contemporaneous rather with that of Virginia, since Champlain landed on the heights of Quebec and laid the foundations of the ancient capital only a year after the English adventurers of the days of King James set their feet on the banks of the river named after that sovereign and commenced the old town which has long since disappeared before the tides of the ocean that stretches away beyond the shores of the Old Dominion.[2] If we in Canada are open to the same charge of attaching too much importance to material things, are we able at the same time to point to as notable achievements in literature as results of the three centuries that have nearly passed since the foundation of New France? I do not suppose that the most patriotic Canadian, however ready to eulogize his own country, will make an effort to claim an equality with New England in this respect; but, if indeed we feel it necessary to offer any comparison that would do us justice, it would be with that Virginia whose history is contemporaneous with that of French Canada. Statesmanship rather than Letters has been the pride and ambition of the Old Dominion, its brightest and highest achievement. Virginia has been the mother of great orators and great presidents, and her men of letters sink into insignificance alongside of those of New England. It may be said, too, of Canada, that her history in the days of the French regime, during the struggle for responsible government, as well as at the birth of confederation, gives us the names of men of statesmanlike designs and of patriotic purpose. From the days of Champlain to the establishment of the confederation, Canada has had the services of men as eminent in their respective spheres, and as successful in the attainment of popular rights, in moulding the educational and political institutions of the country, and in laying broad and deep the foundations of a new nationality across half a continent, as those great Virginians to whom the world is ever ready to pay its meed of respect. These Virginian statesmen won their fame in the large theatre of national achievement—in laying the basis of the most remarkable federal republic the world has ever seen; whilst Canadian public men have laboured with equal earnestness and ability in that far less conspicuous and brilliant arena of colonial development, the eulogy of which has to be written in the histories of the future.
[A] In all cases the references are to the Notes in the Appendix.
Let me now ask you to follow me for a short time whilst I review some of the most salient features of our intellectual progress since the days Canada entered on its career of competition in the civilization of this continent. So far there have been three well defined eras of development in the country now known as the Dominion of Canada. First, there was the era of French Canadian occupation which in many respects had its heroic and picturesque features. Then, after the cession of Canada to England, came that era of political and constitutional struggle for a larger measure of public liberty which ended in the establishment of responsible government about half a century ago. Then we come to that era which dates from the confederation of the provinces—an era of which the first quarter of a century only has passed, of which the signs are still full of promise, despite the prediction of gloomy thinkers, if Canadians remain true to themselves and face the future with the same courage and confidence that have distinguished the past.
As I have just said, the days of the French regime were in a sense days of heroic endeavour, since we see in the vista of the past a small colony whose total population at no period exceeded eighty thousand souls, chiefly living on the banks of the St. Lawrence, between Quebec and Montreal, and contending against great odds for the supremacy on the continent of America. The pen of Francis Parkman has given a vivid picture of those days when bold adventurers unlocked the secrets of this Canadian Dominion, pushed into the western wilderness, followed unknown rivers, and at last found a way to the waters of that southern gulf where Spain had long before, in the days of Grijalva, Cortez and Pineda, planted her flag and won treasures of gold and silver from an unhappy people who soon learned to curse the day when the white men came to the fair islands of the south and the rich country of Mexico. In these days the world, with universal acclaim has paid its tribute of admiration to the memory of a great Discoverer who had the courage of his convictions and led the way to the unknown lands beyond the Azores and the Canaries. This present generation has forgiven him much in view of his heroism in facing the dangers of unknown seas and piercing their mysteries. His purpose was so great, and his success so conspicuous, that both have obscured his human weakness. In some respects he was wiser than the age in which he lived; in others he was the product of the greed and the superstition of that age; but we who owe him so much forget the frailty of the man in the sagacity of the Discoverer. As Canadians, however, now review the character of the great Genoese, and of his compeers and successors in the opening up of this continent, they must, with pride, come to the conclusion that none of these men can compare in nobility of purpose, in sincere devotion to God, King and Country, with Champlain, the sailor of Brouage, who became the founder of Quebec and the father of New France.
In the daring ventures of Marquette, Jolliet, La Salle and Tonty, in the stern purpose of Frontenac, in the far-reaching plans of La Galissonière, in the military genius of Montcalm, the historian of the present time has at his command the most attractive materials for his pen. But we cannot expect to find the signs of intellectual development among a people where there was not a single printing press, where freedom of thought and action was repressed by a paternal absolutism, where the struggle for life was very bitter up to the last hours of French supremacy in a country constantly exposed to the misfortunes of war, and too often neglected by a king who thought more of his mistresses than of his harassed and patient subjects across the sea. Yet that memorable period—days of struggle in many ways—was the origin of a large amount of literature which we, in these times, find of the deepest interest and value from a historic point of view. The English colonies of America cannot present us with any books which, for faithful narrative and simplicity of style, bear comparison with the admirable works of Champlain, explorer and historian,[3] or with those of the genial and witty advocate, Marc Lescarbot,[4] names that can never be forgotten on the picturesque heights of Quebec, or on the banks of the beautiful basin of Annapolis. Is there a Canadian or American writer who is not under a deep debt of obligation to the clear-headed and industrious Jesuit traveller, Charlevoix,[5] the Nestor of French Canadian history? The only historical writer that can at all surpass him in New England was the loyalist Governor Hutchinson, and he published his books at a later time when the French dominion had disappeared with the fall of Quebec.[6] To the works just mentioned we may add the books of Gabriel Sagard,[7] and of Boucher, the governor of Three Rivers and founder of a still eminent French Canadian family;[8] that remarkable collection of authentic historic narrative, known as the Jesuit Relations;[9] even that tedious Latin compilation by Père du Creux,[10] the useful narrative by La Potherie,[11] the admirable account of Indian life and customs by the Jesuit Lafitau,[11a] and that now very rare historical account of the French colony, the "Etablissement de la Foy dans la Nouvelle France," written by the Recollet le Clercq,[12] probably aided by Frontenac. In these and other works, despite their diffuseness in some cases, we have a library of historical literature, which, when supplemented by the great stores of official documents still preserved in the French archives, is of priceless value as a true and minute record of the times in which the authors lived, or which they described from the materials to which they alone had access. It may be said with truth that none of these writers were Canadians in the sense that they were born or educated in Canada, but still they were the product of the life, the hardships and the realities of New France—it was from this country they drew the inspiration that gave vigour and colour to their writings. New England, as I have already said, never originated a class of writers who produced work of equal value, or indeed of equal literary merit. Religious and polemic controversy had the chief attraction for the gloomy, disputatious puritan native of Massachusetts and the adjoining colonies. Cotton Mather was essentially a New England creation, and if quantity were the criterion of literary merit then he was the most distinguished author of his century; for it is said that indefatigable antiquarians have counted up the titles of nearly four hundred books and pamphlets by this industrious writer. His principal work, however, was the "Magnalia Christi Americana, or Ecclesiastical History of New England from 1620 to 1698,"[13] a large folio, remarkable as a curious collection of strange conceits, forced witticisms, and prolixity of narrative, in which the venturesome reader soon finds himself so irretrievably mystified and lost that he rises from the perusal with wonderment that so much learning, as was evidently possessed by the author, could be so used to bewilder the world of letters. The historical knowledge is literally choked up with verbiage and mannerisms. Even prosy du Creux becomes tolerable at times compared with the garrulous Puritan author.
ab