Thomas Henry Huxley

On the Border Territory Between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms

Published by Good Press, 2021
goodpress@okpublishing.info
EAN 4064066315535

Table of Contents


Cover
Titlepage
Versions ofOn the Border Territory Between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms
On the Border Territory Between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms

Versions ofOn the Border Territory Between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms

Table of Contents
  • Huxley, Thomas Henry (1876), "On the Border Territory Between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms" in Macmillan's Magazine 33: 373-84.
  • "On the Border Territory Between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms" by Thomas Henry Huxley in Popular Science Monthly, 8 (April 1876)
  • "On the Border Territory between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms" by Huxley, Thomas Henry in Littell's Living Age, 128 (1657) (1876)
  • Thomas Henry Huxley (1888), "On the Border Territory Between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms in Science and Culture, and Other Essays.
  • Huxley, Thomas Henry (1894), "On the Border Territory Between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms in Discourses Biological and Geological.

On the Border Territory Between the Animal and the Vegetable Kingdoms

Table of Contents

Layout 4

THE

POPULAR SCIENCE

MONTHLY.

Table of Contents
 

APRIL, 1876.

Table of Contents

 

ON THE BORDER TERRITORY BETWEEN THE ANIMAL AND THE VEGETABLE KINGDOMS.
By T. H. HUXLEY, LL. D., F. R. S.

IN the whole history of science there is nothing more remarkable than the rapidity of the growth of biological knowledge within the last half century, and the extent of the modification which has thereby been effected in some of the fundamental conceptions of the naturalist.

In the second edition of the "Règne Animal," published in 1828, Cuvier devotes a special section to the "Division of Organized Beings into Animals and Vegetables," in which the question is treated with that comprehensiveness of knowledge and clear critical judgment which characterize his writings, and justify us in regarding them as representative expressions of the most extensive, if not the profoundest, knowledge of his time. He tells us that living beings have been subdivided from the earliest time into animated beings, which possess sense and motion, and inanimated beings, which are devoid of these functions, and simply vegetate.

Although the roots of plants direct themselves toward moisture, and their leaves toward air and light; although the parts of some plants exhibit oscillating movements without any perceptible cause, and the leaves of others retract when touched, yet none of these movements justify the ascription to plants of perception or of will.

From the mobility of animals, Cuvier, with his characteristic partiality for teleological reasoning, deduces the necessity of the existence in them of an alimentary cavity or reservoir of food, whence their nutrition may be drawn by the vessels, which are a sort of internal roots; and in the presence of this alimentary cavity he naturally sees the primary and the most important distinction between animals and plants.

Following out his teleological argument, Cuvier remarks that the organization of this cavity and its appurtenances must needs vary-according to the nature of the aliment, and the operations which it has to undergo, before it can be converted into substances fitted for absorption; while the atmosphere and the earth supply plants with juices ready prepared, and which can be absorbed immediately.

As the animal body required to be independent of heat and of the atmosphere, there were no means by which the motion of its fluids could be produced by internal causes. Hence arose the second great distinctive character of animals, or the circulatory system, which is less important than the digestive, since it was unnecessary, and therefore is absent, in the more simple animals.

Animals further needed muscles for locomotion and nerves for sensibility. Hence, says Cuvier, it was necessary that the chemical composition of the animal body should be more complicated than that of the plant; and it is so, inasmuch as an additional substance, nitrogen, enters into it as an essential element, while in plants nitrogen is only accidentally joined with the three other fundamental constituents of organic beings—carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Indeed, he afterward affirms that nitrogen is peculiar to animals; and herein he places the third distinction between the animal and the plant.