Cover Page

Table of Contents

Series Page

Title page

Contributors

Preface

Chapter 1: Diagnostic Tests in Chronic Kidney Disease

Urine Testing

Non-visible Haematuria

Microalbuminuria and Proteinuria

Tests of Kidney Function

Renal Imaging

Renal Biopsy

Further Reading

Chapter 2: Acute Kidney Injury (Formerly Known as Acute Renal Failure)

Definition and Classification

Pre-renal Acute Kidney Injury

Intrinsic Renal Acute Kidney Injury

Post-renal Acute Kidney Injury

Prevention

Differential Diagnosis

Investigations

Management Principles

Summary

Further Reading

Chapter 3: Prevalence, Detection, Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease

Introduction

Prevalence and Staging of Chronic Kidney Disease

Detection

Evaluation

Creatinine/Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

Albuminuria/Proteinuria (also See Chapter 1)

Haematuria (also See Chapter 1)

Renal Imaging (also See Chapter 1)

More Specialist/Other Renal Screening Tests for Underlying Cause of Chronic Kidney Disease

Management

References

Chapter 4: Pre-Dialysis Clinics: Preparing for End-Stage Renal Disease

Education

Preservation of Existing Renal Function and Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Addressing Complications of Chronic Kidney Disease

Planning for End-stage Renal Failure

Additional Care Given in Low Clearance Clinics

Further Reading

Chapter 5: Anaemia Management in Chronic Kidney Disease

Prevalence and Impact of Anaemia of Chronic Kidney Disease

Causes

Previous Management Practices

Current Management

The Role of Care in the Community

References

Chapter 6: Urinary Tract Infections, Renal Stones, Renal Cysts and Tumours and Pregnancy in Chronic Kidney Disease

Urinary Tract Infections in Adults

Kidney Stones (Nephrolithiasis)

Renal Cysts and Tumours

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Pregnancy in Chronic Kidney Disease

Further Reading

Chapter 7: Adult Nephrotic Syndrome

Nephrotic Syndrome

Conditions Causing Nephrotic Syndrome

The Pathophysiological Reasons for Nephrotic Syndrome

Explanations for Oedema in Nephrotic Syndrome

Complications of Nephrotic Syndrome

Assessing the Patient Presenting with Nephrotic Syndrome

Investigations

General Treatment Measures for Nephrotic Syndrome

Management of Primary and Secondary Glomerular Diseases Causing Nephrotic Syndrome

Conclusions

References

Further Resources

Chapter 8: Renal Artery Stenosis

Definition and Background

Clinical Features

Pathogenesis of Renal Dysfunction in Patients with Renal Artery Stenosis

Investigations

Management of Renal Artery Stenosis

Medical Treatment

Renal Revascularization

Prognosis of Patients with Atheromatous Renovascular Disease

Further Reading

Chapter 9: Palliative Care for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Introduction

Which Renal Patients Need Palliative Care?

The Extent of the Clinical Need

Conservative Management of Patients Choosing not to Dialyse

Withdrawal from Dialysis

Symptoms: Identification and Control

Advanced Planning

Links with Palliative Care Services

Conclusions

References

Further Reading

Chapter 10: Dialysis

Introduction

Indications for Starting Renal Replacement Therapy

Preparation for Renal Replacement Therapy

Renal Replacement Therapy

Monitoring Adequacy of Renal Replacement Therapy

Developments in Delivery of Renal Replacement Therapy

Further Reading

Chapter 11: Renal Transplantation

Introduction

Immunological Aspects of Transplantation

The Kidney Donor

Recipient

Bladder Function

Surgical Aspects

Post-operative Management

Immunosuppression

Complications

Rejection

Chronic Allograft Nephropathy

Infection

Malignancy

Recurrence

Outcome

The Future

Further Reading

Chapter 12: Chronic Kidney Disease, Dialysis and Transplantation in Children

Introduction

Structural Abnormalities of the Kidneys and Urinary Tract

Polycystic Kidney Disease

Inherited, Tubular and Metabolic Diseases

Idiopathic Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome

Glomerulonephritis in Children

Chronic Kidney Disease

Renal Replacement Therapy

Further Reading

Chapter 13: The Organization of Services for People with Chronic Kidney Disease: A 21st-Century Challenge

Introduction

The 2007 Model of Service

Challenges for Renal Health Care

The Roles of Primary Care

Planning for Renal Replacement Therapy

Dialysis and Transplantation

Independent Sector Treatment Centres

Supportive and Palliative Care in Chronic Kidney Disease

Current Developments (See Appendix 4)

Conclusion

References

Further Reading

Appendix 1: Chronic Kidney Disease and Drug Prescribing

Pain Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Prescribing for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease/End Stage Renal Failure

Further Resources

Appendix 2: Glossary of Renal Terms and Conditions

Alport's Syndrome

Anti-GBM (Goodpasture's) Disease

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Diabetic Nephropathy (DN)

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Glomerulonephritis

IgA disease and Henoch–Schönlein Purpura

Interstitial Nephritis

Lupus Nephritis

Membranous Nephropathy

Minimal Change Nephropathy

Myeloma, Amyloid and the Kidney

Nephrotic Syndrome

Pyelonephritis

Renal (ANCA-positive) Vasculitis

Renovascular Disease

Thin Membrane Nephropathy

Appendix 3: Top Ten Tips in Kidney Disease

1 Acute Screen

2 Hyperkalaemia

3 Contrast Nephrotoxicity (CN)

4 Starting an ACE Inhibitor +/−ARB

5 Change in GFR

6 Proteinuria

7 Sudden Onset of Heavy Proteinuria

8 Haematuria (Visible or Non-visible)

9 Correcting eGFR for Race

10 Non-diabetic Renal Disease

Appendix 4: Maps Showing Variation in Healthcare for People with Kidney Disease

Figure A4.1 Rate of RRT per population by country (2009; for 6 of the countries, data are not 2009)

Figure A4.2 Proportion (%) of people starting RRT for CKD <90 days after presenting to renal services by renal centre (2009)

Figure A4.3 Percentage of patients on the CKD register in whom the last blood-pressure reading, measured in the preceding 15 months, is 140/85 mmHg or less by PCT (2010/11)

Figure A4.4 Percentage of patients with diabetes with a diagnosis of proteinuria or micro-albuminuria who are treated with ACEIs (or A2 antagonists) by PCT (2010/11)

Index

Advertisement

ffirs
Title Page

Contributors

Penny Ackland
General Practitioner, Nunhead Surgery, Nunhead Grove, South East London, UK

 

Behdad Afzali
Wellcome Trust Senior Fellow in Nephrology, King's College London, London, UK

 

James O. Burton
NIHR Clinical Lecturer, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, School of Medicine and Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

 

Frances Coldstream
NIHR GSTFT/KCL Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

John Feehally
Professor of Nephrology, The John Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK

 

Sean Gallagher
Senior House Officer, Renal Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

David Goldsmith
Reader in Renal Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, King's College London, London, UK

 

Irene Hadjimichael
Renal ST5, South Thames Rotation at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Ming He
Clinical Fellow in Transplant Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Rachel Hilton
Consultant Nephrologist, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Richard Hull
Specialist Registrar Nephrology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Satish Jayawardene
Consultant Nephrologist, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Philip Kalra
Consultant Nephrologist and Honorary Professor of Nephrology, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK

 

Douglas Maclean
Former Renal Pharmacist, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (deceased)

 

Christopher W. McIntyre
Reader in Vascular Medicine, Department of Renal Medicine, Derby City Hospital, Derby, UK

 

Emma Murphy
BRC PhD Clinical Research Training Fellow, NIHR GSTFT/KCL Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

 

Donal O' Donoghue
Consultant Renal Physician, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK
National Clinical Director for Renal Services

 

Christopher Reid
Consultant Paediatric Nephrologist, Evelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Neil S. Sheerin
Professor of Renal Medicine, Newcastle University and Medical School, Newcastle, UK

 

John Taylor
Consultant Transplant Surgeon, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Judy Taylor
Consultant Paediatric Nephrologist, Evelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Katie Vinen
Consultant Nephrologist, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Hayley Wells
Chief Renal Pharmacist, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

 

Eleri Wood
Senior Sister Low Clearance & Transplant Clinics, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Preface

This is the second edition of this popular handbook on kidney disease. It is necessary because important advances have been made in several areas, including the treatment of the anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease. Moreover, with the passage of time, more is now known about the prevalence, and importance, of chronic kidney disease in the United Kingdom and the rest of the world. In this second edition, we refine the presentation of the information concerning chronic kidney disease, we expand on the importance of good preparation for dialysis and transplantation, where those options are relevant, and we expand on the important area of conservative, or non-dialytic, management of the symptoms of chronic kidney disease, an option which is taken by increasing numbers. We have also revised the appendices, which include a Top Ten Tips section for quick reference. All in all, we hope and feel that this new version is an improvement on its predecessor, and that readers (from students to non-kidney specialists) will find this book a useful guide to the best management of a growing number of patients.

Chapter 1

Diagnostic Tests in Chronic Kidney Disease

Behdad Afzali1, Satish Jayawardene2 and David Goldsmith1

1King's College London, London, UK

2King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK


Overview

Symptoms of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are often non-specific (Table 1.1). Clinical signs (of CKD, or of systemic diseases or syndromes) may be present and recognized early on in the natural history of kidney disease but, more often, both symptoms and signs are only present and recognized very late—sometimes too late to permit effective treatment in time to prepare for dialysis. However, the most commonly performed test of renal function—plasma creatinine—is typically performed with every hospital inpatient and as part of investigations or screening during many GP surgery or hospital clinic outpatient episodes.

Table 1.1 Signs and symptoms of chronic kidney disease

Symptoms Signs
Tiredness Pallor
Anorexia Leuconychia
Nausea and vomiting Peripheral oedema
Itching Pleural effusion
Nocturia, frequency, oliguria Pulmonary oedema
Haematuria Raised blood pressure
Frothy urine
Loin pain

Unlike ‘angina’ or ‘chronic obstructive airways disease’, where a history can be revealing (e.g. walking distance or cough), there is little that is quantifiable about CKD severity without blood and/or urine testing.

This is why serendipitous discovery of kidney problems (haematuria, proteinuria, structural abnormalities on kidney imaging or loss of kidney function) is a common ‘presentation’. A full understanding of what these abnormalities mean and a clear guide to ‘what to do next’ are particularly needed in kidney medicine, and filling this gap is one of the aims of this book.

Correct use and interpretation of urine dipsticks and plasma creatinine values (by far the commonest tests used for screening and identification of kidney disease) is the main focus of this chapter. Renal imaging and renal biopsy will also be described briefly.

Urine Testing

Urinalysis is a basic test for the presence and severity of kidney disease. Testing urine during the menstrual period in women, and within 2–3 days of heavy strenuous exercise in both genders, should be avoided, to avoid contamination or artefacts. Fresh ‘mid-stream’ urine is best, again to reduce accidental contamination. Refrigeration of urine at temperatures from +2 to +8°C assists preservation. Specimens that have languished in an overstretched hospital laboratory specimen reception area, before eventually undergoing analysis, will rarely reveal all of the potential information that could have been gained.

Changes in urine colour are usually noticed by patients. Table 1.2 shows the main causes of different-coloured urine. Chemical parameters of the urine that can be detected using dipsticks include urine pH, haemoglobin, glucose, protein, leucocyte esterase, nitrites and ketones. Figure 1.1 shows the dipstick in its ‘dry’ state and an example of a positive test. Table 1.3 shows the main false negative and false positive results that can interfere with correct interpretation.

Table 1.2 The main causes of differently coloured urine

Pink–red–brown–black Yellow–brown Blue–green
Gross haematuria (e.g. bladder or renal tumour; IgA nephropathy) Jaundice
Drugs: chloroquine, nitrofurantoin
Drugs: triamterene
Dyes: methylene blue
Haemoglobinuria (e.g. drug reaction)
Myoglobinuria (e.g. rhabdomyolysis)
Acute intermittent porphyria
Alkaptonuria
Drugs: phenytoin, rifampicin (red); metronidazole, methyldopa (darkening on standing)
Foods: beetroot, blackberries

Figure 1.1 Urine dipstick—the urine on the right is normal and the colours of all of the squares on the urine dipstick are normal/negative. The urine on the left is from someone with acute glomerulonephritis, looks pink-brown macroscopically and has maximal blood and protein on the dipstick.

1.1

Table 1.3 The main causes of false negative and false positive testing from use of urine dipsticks

Test False positive False negative
Haemoglobin Myoglobin Ascorbic acid
Microbial peroxidases Delayed examination
Proteinuria Very alkaline urine (pH 9) Tubular proteins
Chlorhexidine Immunoglobulin light chains
Globulins
Glucose Oxidizing detergents UTI
Ascorbic acid

Discounting contamination from menstrual—or other—bleeding, and exercise-induced haematuria and proteinuria.

Urine microscopy can only add useful information to urinalysis when there is a reliable methodology for collection, storage and analysis. This is often lacking, even in hospitals. Early-morning urine is best, with rapid sample centrifugation. Under ideal circumstances cells (erythrocytes, leucocytes, renal tubular cells and urinary epithelial cells), casts (cylinders of proteinaceous matrix), crystals, lipids and organisms can be reliably identified where present in urine. Figure 1.2 shows a red cell cast in urine (indicative of acute renal inflammation). Figure 1.3 shows urinary crystals.

Figure 1.2 Microscopy of centrifuged fresh urine. There is a red cell cast (protein skeleton with incorporated red blood cells). This is characteristic of acute glomerulonephritis.

1.2

Figure 1.3 Crystalluria.

1.3

Non-visible Haematuria

Definition and Background

In healthy people red blood cells (rbc) are not present in the urine in > 95% of cases. Large numbers of rbcs make the urine pink or red.

Non-visible haematuria (NVH) (formerly known as microscopic haematuria) is commonly defined as the presence of greater than two rbcs per high power field in a centrifuged urine sediment. It is seen in 3–6% of the normal population, and in 5–10% of those relatives of kidney patients who undergo screening for potential kidney donation.

NVH can be an incidental finding of no prognostic importance, or the first sign of intrinsic renal disease or urological malignancy. It always requires assessment, and most often requires referral to a kidney specialist or to a urologist.

Clinical Features

The finding of NVH is usually as a result of routine medical examination for employment, insurance or GP-registration purposes in an otherwise apparently healthy adult. Initially, therefore, NVH is an issue for primary healthcare workers. The goal of an assessment is to understand whether:

Investigations

Typically, the full evaluation of NVH requires hospital-based investigations. Box 1.1 lists these in a logical order.


Box 1.1 : Investigations required for the work-up of patients with non-visible haematuria

Management

Any patient who presents with persistent non-visible haematuria over the age of 40 should be referred to a urologist. A renal ultrasound, urine cytology and a flexible cystoscopy to exclude urological cancer would normally be undertaken.

Any patient who has abnormal renal function, proteinuria, hypertension and a normal cystoscopy should be referred to a kidney specialist.

Renal biopsy is required to establish a diagnosis with absolute certainty in most cases of ‘renal haematuria’. Those patients who additionally have renal impairment, heavy proteinuria, hypertension, positive autoantibodies, low complement levels or have a family history of renal disease should be considered for a renal biopsy.

Please also see the 2008 NICE CKD guidelines for further information on NVH, http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12069/42119/42119.pdf.

Prognosis

The prognosis for most patients with asymptomatic NVH without urological malignancy and no evidence of intrinsic renal disease is very good. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss the prognosis of all the causes of non-visible haematuria, as listed in Table 1.4. However, some general observations apply for those patients in whom there is no structural cause for NVH and bleeding is glomerular, and these are given below.

Table 1.4 Causes of non-visible haematuria

Renal causes Systemic causes Miscellaneous and urological causes
IgA nephropathy Systemic lupus erythematosus Cystic diseases of the kidney
Thin basement membrane disease Henoch–Schönlein purpura Papillary necrosis
Alport's syndrome Urothelial tumours
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Renal and bladder stones
Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis Exercise-induced haematuria
Post-infectious glomerulonephritis

In the presence of impaired renal function, it is mandatory to try to achieve blood pressure control (<130/80 mmHg) and reduction of microalbuminuria or proteinuria (if present). Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are useful agents, as they achieve both of these desired effects. It is very important to recheck plasma creatinine and potassium about 7–14 days after starting ACE or ARB, and regularly thereafter—an increase of ≥ 30% in plasma creatinine or a fall of ≥ 25% eGFR, or a rise of plasma potassium to exceed 5.5 mmol/L, should occasion recall to consider abandoning the drugs or reducing the dose, further investigations, and dietary advice for potassium restriction if relevant.

It is important that these patients, whether monitored in the community or at a hospital-based clinic, have their urine tested, BP measured and renal function monitored regularly. If not under renal specialist follow-up, the development of hypertension, proteinuria or deterioration in renal function are all indications for referral to a specialist unit (see Chapter 3).

Microalbuminuria and Proteinuria

Protein is normally present in urine in small quantities. Tubular proteins (e.g. Tamm-Horsfall) and low amounts of albumin can be detected in healthy people. Microalbuminuria (MAU) refers to the presence of elevated urinary albumin concentrations (see Table 1.5); MAU is a sign of either systemic or renal malfunction.

Table 1.5 Equivalent ranges for urinary protein loss

c01tnt005

MAU is measured by quantitative immunoassay—and is an important first and early sign of many renal conditions, particularly diabetic renal disease and other glomerulopathies. It is also strongly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Around 10% of the population can be shown to have persistent MAU. For confirmation, two out of three consecutive analyses should show MAU in the same three-month period.

UAER (urinary albumin excretion rate)—in a healthy population the normal range for UAER is 1.5–20 µg/min. UAER increases with strenuous exercise, a high-protein diet, pregnancy and urinary tract infections (UTIs). Daytime UAER is 25% higher than at night (so for daytime urine, an upper normal limit of 30 µg/min is often used). Overnight timed collections can be performed (and microalbuminuric range is an overnight UAER of 20–200 µg/min), but for unselected population screening the albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) in early-morning urine is preferable. An ACR of > 2 predicts a UAER of > 30 µg/min with a high sensitivity.

Increasingly favoured as a screening tool is the urinary protein:creatinine ratio (PCR). This is best done on ‘spot’ early-morning urine samples (as renal protein excretion has a diurnal rhythm; see below). This is now preferable to relying on 24-hour urine collections. There is an inherent assumption in using PCR that urinary creatinine concentration is 10 mmol/L (in practice it can range from 2 to 30), but this is of little practical importance for its use as a screening tool. A PCR of 100 mg/mmol corresponds roughly to 1 g/L of proteinuria.

One question often asked is how to ‘convert’ an ACR to a PCR. At low levels of proteinuria (<1 g/day), a rough conversion is that doubling the ACR will give you the PCR. At proteinuria excretion rates of > 1 g/day, the relationship is more accurately represented by 1.3×ACR = PCR.

Table 1.5 attempts to display all of the different ways to express urinary protein to allow for comparisons between methods.

Please note that the normal range for protein excretion in pregnancy is up to 300 mg/day, with clinical significance (pre-eclampsia or renal disease) being more likely once 500 mg or more is excreted per day. See Chapter 6.

Please also see the 2008 NICE CKD guidelines on albuminuria, proteinuria and eGFR, http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12069/42119/42119.pdf.

Tests of Kidney Function

The kidney has exocrine and endocrine functions. The most important function to assess, however, is renal excretory capacity, which we measure as glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Each kidney has about 1 million nephrons, and the measured GFR is the composite function of all nephrons in both kidneys. Conceptually, it can be understood as the (virtual) clearance of a substance from a volume of plasma into the urine per unit of time. The substance can be endogenous (creatinine, cystatin C) or exogenous (inulin, iohexol, iothalamate, 51Cr-EDTA, 99mTc-DTPA). This ‘ideal substance’ to measure kidney function does not exist—ideal characteristics being free filtration across the glomerulus, neither reabsorption from nor excretion into renal tubules, existing in a steady state concentration in plasma, and being easily and reliably measured. Despite creatinine failing several of these criteria, it is universally used, and we shall concentrate on interpreting creatinine concentration in urine and blood as it aids derivation of GFR.

The basic anatomy of the kidney and the anatomy and basic physiology of the ‘nephron’ (the functional component of the kidney), are shown in Figure 7.1.

Table 1.6 shows the different ways in which both plasma urea and plasma creatinine may be ‘artefactually’ elevated or reduced, which can lead to misunderstanding and miscalculation of renal function. Creatinine is measured by two quite different techniques in the laboratory—one, the Jaffe reaction, relies on creatinine reacting with an alkaline picrate solution but is not specific for creatinine (e.g. cephalosporins, acetoacetate and ascorbate), while the other, the enzymatic method, is more accurate. Eventually, isotope-dilution mass spectroscopy (IDMS) may render both of these variously flawed techniques redundant, either by direct substitution of method or by allowing IDMS-traceable creatinine values to be reported.

Table 1.6 Problems with sole reliance on plasma concentrations of urea and creatinine to determine renal function

Factors independent of renal function that can affect plasma urea Factors independent of renal function that can affect plasma creatinine Other factors that can affect interpretation of plasma creatinine values
Hydration
Burns
Steroids
Diuretics
Liver disease
Diet (protein)
Diet (meat)
Creatine supplements (e.g. body builders)
Age
Body habitus
Race
Use of Jaffe reaction in laboratories: interference by glucose, ascorbate, acetoacetate
Use of enzymatic reaction in laboratories: interference by ethamsylate or flucytosine

Creatinine is produced at an almost constant rate from muscle-derived creatine and phosphocreatine. However, as can be seen from Figure 1.4, it is an insensitive marker of early loss of renal function (fall in GFR), and as renal function declines there is correspondingly more tubular creatinine secretion. It varies with diet, gender, disease state and muscle mass.

Figure 1.4 Relationship between plasma creatinine and glomerular filtration rate.

1.4

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

The manipulation of plasma creatinine to derive a rapid estimation of creatinine clearance is very useful clinically, and is now formally recommended (as of April 2006—see Chapters 3 and 4) to aid appropriate identification and referral of patients with CKD. There are several formulaic ways of doing this, and the formula that has been adopted in the United Kingdom, United States and many countries is the four-variable Modification Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation (Figure 1.5 and Chapter 3), but it must be appreciated that this formula has not been validated in ethnic minority patients, in older patients, in pregnant women, the malnourished, amputees or in children under 16 years of age.

Figure 1.5 Four-variable Modification Diet in Renal Disease equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate.

1.5

Useful though deriving a value for GFR is, the value derived using the MDRD formula is only an estimate whose accuracy diminishes as GFR exceeds 60 mL/min, and values should therefore be viewed as having significant error margins rather than being precise. Values can only properly be used when renal function is in ‘steady state’, i.e. not in acute kidney injury. It is unwise to rely exclusively on the formula when the eGFR is between 60 and 89 mL/min (CKD stage 2), because of its shortcomings, while values > 90 mL/min should be reported thus (i.e. not as a precise figure). There is an urgent unmet need for better markers, and better formulae.

Formal nuclear medicine or research-laboratory-derived measures of GFR are expensive, time-consuming and largely (and increasingly) confined to research studies.

Please also see the 2008 NICE CKD guidelines for the assessment and interpretation of kidney function/eGFR, http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12069/42119/42119.pdf.

Renal Imaging

There is a wide range of imaging techniques available to localize and interrogate the kidneys. Table 1.7 gives the preferred methods for a range of conditions. Intravascular contrast studies are still used, though ultrasound has replaced most IVU/IVP (Intravenous urogram/intravenous pyelogram) examinations. Low osmolar non-ionic agents are less nephrotoxic and better tolerated. Reactions to contrast agents can be severe, though rarely life-threatening. In addition, renal impairment (usually mild and reversible, sometimes severe and irreversible) can be seen after the use of intravenous contrast. In patients with a plasma creatinine > 130 µmol/L (eGFR <60 mL/min), thought must be given to the wisdom of the investigation. Pre-existing renal impairment, advanced age, diabetes and diuretic use or dehydration significantly increase the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. The mainstay of prevention is understanding the risk and avoiding dehydration (by judiciously hydrating patients and promoting urine flow) using saline or 0.45% sodium bicarbonate. The dopamine agonist fenoldopam and the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine have both been proposed as protective agents; oral N-acetylcysteine has been widely assessed with conflicting results and its role remains uncertain. However, it is an inexpensive agent without significant side-effects, and its use in clinical practice may not therefore be inappropriate.

Table 1.7 Renal imaging techniques and their main indications/applications

Condition Technique
Renal failure Ultrasound
Proteinuria/nephrotic syndrome Ultrasound
Renal artery stenosis MRA
Renal stones Plain abdominal film
Non-contrast CT
Renal infection Ultrasound or CT abdomen
Retroperitoneal fibrosis CT abdomen

MRA, magnetic resonance angiogram.

A comprehensive review of all imaging techniques is beyond the scope of this chapter. We shall concentrate on ultrasound imaging as this is by far the most often used for screening and investigation. Reference to radionuclide imaging and IVU/IVP is made in Chapter 12. Renal size is usually in proportion to body height, and normally lies between 9 and 12 cm. Box 1.2 shows reasons for enlarged or shrunken kidneys. The echo-consistency of the renal cortex is reduced compared to medulla and the collecting system. In adults the loss of this ‘corticomedullary differentiation’ is a sensitive but non-specific marker of CKD. Apart from renal size and corticomedullary differentiation, the other significant abnormalities reported by ultrasound include the presence of cysts (simple, complex), solid lesions and urinary obstruction. Figure 1.6 shows a normal kidney (a) and an obstructed kidney (b). Examination of the bladder and prostate is usually undertaken alongside scanning of native (or transplanted) kidneys.

Figure 1.6 (a) Ultrasound appearance of a normal kidney: dark areas represent renal cortex, and the central white area is the renal pelvis and collecting system. (b) An obstructed kidney, which shows in its centre a severely dilated renal pelvis and calyces (containing urine which is ‘dark’ on ultrasound).

1.6

Box 1.2 : Reasons for enlarged or shrunken kidneys on renal imaging
Large kidneys—symmetrical
Diabetes
Acromegaly
Amyloidosis
Lymphoma

 

Large kidney—asymmetrical
Compensatory hypertrophy (e.g. secondary to nephrectomy)
Renal vein thrombosis

 

Large kidneys—irregular outline
Polycystic kidney disease
Other multicystic disease

 

Small kidneys—symmetrical
Chronic kidney disease
Bilateral renal artery stenosis
Bilateral hypoplasia

 

Small kidney—unilateral
Renal artery stenosis
Unilateral hypoplasia
Scarring from reflux nephropathy

Renal angiography and other techniques relevant to renal blood vessels are covered in Chapter 8. Radionuclide imaging is used for renal scars and urinary reflux, which is also mentioned in part in Chapter 12.

Renal Biopsy

A renal biopsy is undertaken to investigate and diagnose renal disease in native and transplanted kidneys. Table 1.8 shows the main indications, contra-indications and complications of this test. It is a highly specialized investigation, which should only be performed after careful consideration of the risk/benefit ratio, and with the close support of experienced imaging and renal histopathological teams.

Table 1.8 Indications for renal biopsy