William Henry Holmes

Origin and Development of Form and Ornament in Ceramic Art

Published by Good Press, 2019
goodpress@okpublishing.info
EAN 4064066241407

Table of Contents


ILLUSTRATIONS.
ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF FORM AND ORNAMENT IN CERAMIC ART.
By William H. Holmes.
INTRODUCTORY.
ORIGIN OF FORM
MODIFICATION OF FORM.
ORIGIN OF ORNAMENT.
MODIFICATION OF ORNAMENT.
INDEX.

ILLUSTRATIONS.

Table of Contents
Fig.
464.—Form derived from a gourd 446
465.—Form derived from a conch, shell 447
466.—Form derived from a stone pot 448
467.—Form derived from a wooden tray 448
468.—Form derived from a horn spoon 448
469.—Form derived from a bark vessel 446
470.—Form derived from basketry 449
471.—Form derived from basketry 449
472.—Form derived from a wooden vessel 449
473.—Coincident forms 451
474.—Form produced by accident 451
475.—Scroll derived from the spire of a conch shell 454
476.—Theoretical development of current scroll 455
477.—Ornament derived through modification of handles 455
478.—Scroll derived from coil of clay 456
479.—Ornamental use of fillets of clay 456
480.—Variation through, the influence of form 459
481.—Theoretical development of the current scroll 460
482.—Forms of the same motive expressed in different arts 461
483.—Forms of the same motive expressed in different arts 461
484.—Forms of the same motive expressed in different arts 461
485.—Geometric form of textile ornament 462
486.—Loss of geometric accuracy in painting 462
487.—Design painted upon pottery 463
488.—Theoretical development of fret work 464
489.—Theoretical development of scroll work 465

ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF FORM AND ORNAMENT IN CERAMIC ART.

Table of Contents

By William H. Holmes.

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTORY.

Table of Contents

For the investigation of art in its early stages and in its widest sense—there is probably no fairer field than that afforded by aboriginal America, ancient and modern.

At the period of discovery, art at a number of places on the American continent seems to have been developing surely and steadily, through the force of the innate genius of the race, and the more advanced nations were already approaching the threshold of civilization; at the same time their methods were characterized by great simplicity, and their art products are, as a consequence, exceptionally homogeneous.

The advent of European civilization checked the current of growth, and new and conflicting elements were introduced necessarily disastrous to the native development.

There is much, however, in the art of living tribes, especially of those least influenced by the whites, capable of throwing light upon the obscure passages of precolumbian art. By supplementing the study of the prehistoric by that of historic art, which is still in many cases in its incipient stages, we may hope to penetrate deeply into the secrets of the past.

The advantages of this field, as compared with Greece, Egypt, and the Orient, will be apparent when we remember that the dawn of art in these countries lies hidden in the shadow of unnumbered ages, while ours stands out in the light of the very present. This is well illustrated by a remark of Birch, who, in dwelling upon the antiquity of the fictile art, says that "the existence of earthen vessels in Egypt was at least coeval with the formation of a written language."[1] Beyond this there is acknowledged chaos. In strong contrast with this, is the fact that all precolumbian American pottery precedes the acquisition of written language, and this contrast is emphasized by the additional fact that it also antedates the use of the wheel, that great perverter of the plastic tendencies of clay.

The material presented in the following notes is derived chiefly from the native ceramic art of the United States, but the principles involved are applicable to all times and to all art, as they are based upon the laws of nature.

Ceramic art presents two classes of phenomena of importance in the study of the evolution of æsthetic culture. These relate, first, to form, and second, to ornament.

Form, as embodied in clay vessels, embraces, 1st, useful shapes, which may or may not be ornamental, and, 2d, æsthetic shapes, which are ornamental and may be useful. There are also grotesque and fanciful shapes, which may or may not be either useful or ornamental.

No form or class of forms can be said to characterize a particular age or stage of culture. In a general way, of course, the vessels of primitive peoples will be simple in form, while those of more advanced races will be more varied and highly specialized.